<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Pressed Words &#187; Movable Type</title>
	<atom:link href="http://pressedwords.com/tag/movable-type/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://pressedwords.com</link>
	<description>News and commentary about all things WordPress</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 11 Jun 2009 03:54:22 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.4</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Wonkette Switches to WordPress</title>
		<link>http://pressedwords.com/wonkette-using-wordpres/</link>
		<comments>http://pressedwords.com/wonkette-using-wordpres/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 31 May 2008 12:44:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Austin Matzko</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Asides]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Users]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Movable Type]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pressedwords.com/?p=83</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The popular political gossip site Wonkette has switched from using Movable Type to WordPress to power its site.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The popular political gossip site <a href="http://wonkette.com/400067/dumbos-baffled-by-site-move">Wonkette</a> has switched from using Movable Type to WordPress to power its site.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://pressedwords.com/wonkette-using-wordpres/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Adobe on WordPress vs. Movable Type</title>
		<link>http://pressedwords.com/adobe-on-wordpress-vs-movable-type/</link>
		<comments>http://pressedwords.com/adobe-on-wordpress-vs-movable-type/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 May 2008 19:57:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Austin Matzko</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Asides]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Users]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Adobe]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Movable Type]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pressedwords.com/?p=72</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Aaron Campbell points out that the Adobe Linux Flash blog seems to be making a snide comment about Movable Type.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://pressedwords.com/blog/uploads/2008/05/adobe-mt-vs-wp.jpg" alt="" title="adobe-mt-vs-wp" width="347" height="233" class="alignnone size-full wp-image-73" /></p>
<p>Aaron Campbell <a href="http://xavisys.com/adobes-take-on-wordpress-vs-movabletype/">points out</a> that the <a href="http://blogs.adobe.com/penguin.swf/">Adobe Linux Flash blog</a> seems to be making a snide comment about Movable Type.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://pressedwords.com/adobe-on-wordpress-vs-movable-type/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>WordPress Database Errors and the Post Hoc Fallacy</title>
		<link>http://pressedwords.com/instapundit-on-wordpress/</link>
		<comments>http://pressedwords.com/instapundit-on-wordpress/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Apr 2008 20:48:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Austin Matzko</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Users]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[caching]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[database]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Movable Type]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pressedwords.com/?p=45</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Glenn Reynolds at Instapundit mentioned WordPress today in not-so-flattering terms (emphasis added): LIEBERMAN CAMPAIGN CRASHED OWN WEBSITE: &#8220;The server that hosted the joe2006.com Web site failed because it was overutilized and misconfigured.&#8221; That&#8217;s like when people send me a link to their underpowered WordPress blog, then it produces a &#8220;Database Error&#8221; message when too many [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Glenn Reynolds at <a href="http://instapundit.com/archives2/017681.php">Instapundit mentioned WordPress today</a> in not-so-flattering terms (emphasis added):</p>
<blockquote><p>LIEBERMAN CAMPAIGN <a href="http://www.stamfordadvocate.com/localnews/ci_8859029">CRASHED OWN WEBSITE</a>: &#8220;The server that hosted the joe2006.com Web site failed because it was overutilized and misconfigured.&#8221; That&#8217;s like when people send me a link to their underpowered WordPress blog, then it produces a &#8220;Database Error&#8221; message when too many people try to actually read it. I hate that. (<em>Yeah, this happens elsewhere sometimes, but low-power WordPress blogs seem particularly susceptible.</em>)</p></blockquote>
<p>Until WordPress version 2.5, a failed database would generate error screens like the one below:</p>
<p><img src="http://pressedwords.com/blog/uploads/2008/04/db_error.jpg" alt="" title="db_error" width="500" height="282" class="alignnone size-full wp-image-46" /></p>
<p>Note the nifty WordPress branding that appears at the top.  Thanks to that, <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Slashdot_effect">countless Diggers, Slashdotters, and the like</a> began to associate WordPress with failure.  This is a <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Post_hoc_ergo_propter_hoc">post hoc fallacy</a> of course: plenty of sites that buckle under the loads brought by Digg are not powered by WordPress, and many WordPress sites that survive a slashdotting are powered by WordPress.  But in both of those cases, it&#8217;s not obvious; no giant logo greets you to say &#8220;WordPress powers this site, which is staying up just fine!&#8221;</p>
<p>In my opinion, WordPress version 2.5 solved this problem the right way, by adding a non-branded database error message:</p>
<p><img src="http://pressedwords.com/blog/uploads/2008/04/db_error_new.jpg" alt="" title="db_error_new" width="500" height="92" class="alignnone size-full wp-image-47" /></p>
<p>Other people, including both WordPress <a href="http://technosailor.com/2008/04/10/solving-the-wordpress-traffic-overload-problem/">proponents</a> and <a href="http://www.movabletype.com/blog/2008/03/a-wordpress-25-upgrade-guide.html">opponents</a>, think WordPress lacks something by not allowing all of its users to handle heavy database stress.  I&#8217;m not so sure.  </p>
<p>Flexibility is a large part of what makes WordPress such a great application to write  code for.  If you let plugins do just about anything imaginable on every page load, there&#8217;s a good chance that a small host&#8217;s database won&#8217;t be able to handle all of that in the face of a slashdotting.  And that&#8217;s okay.  The vast majority of WordPress users won&#8217;t ever be slashdotted, and so they don&#8217;t need the extra complication, potential server problems, and plugin incompatibilities that built-in caching would produce.  </p>
<p>If yours is the type of site that&#8217;s going to suffer under the Digg effect, then you can install one of the caching plugins to help you endure, or you can count on superior server resources.  Everyone else will be just fine.  </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://pressedwords.com/instapundit-on-wordpress/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>WordPress: Most-Used Blogging Application For the Most Popular Blogs</title>
		<link>http://pressedwords.com/wordpress-most-used-blogging-application-for-the-most-popular-blogs/</link>
		<comments>http://pressedwords.com/wordpress-most-used-blogging-application-for-the-most-popular-blogs/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Jan 2008 15:19:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Austin Matzko</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Users]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Movable Type]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technorati]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pressedwords.com/wordpress-most-used-blogging-application-for-the-most-popular-blogs/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[According to Technorati, more of the top one hundred linked-to blogs use WordPress than any other CMS. Specifically, 34% of those most popular blogs use WordPress, compared to Movable Type&#8217;s 16%. Most WordPress themes announce their version number in the page&#8217;s meta tags. Since I&#8217;m sure Technorati has the data, it would be really interesting [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>According to Technorati, <a href="http://www.cmswire.com/cms/micro-cms/results-most-popular-cms-in-technoratis-top-100-002198.php">more of the top one hundred linked-to blogs use WordPress than any other CMS</a>.  Specifically, 34% of those most popular blogs use WordPress, compared to Movable Type&#8217;s 16%.</p>
<p>Most WordPress themes announce their version number in the page&#8217;s meta tags.  Since I&#8217;m sure Technorati has the data, it would be really interesting if Technorati would give a breakdown of the most popular WordPress versions.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://pressedwords.com/wordpress-most-used-blogging-application-for-the-most-popular-blogs/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

