<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: How Many Bloggers Use Each Version of WordPress</title>
	<atom:link href="http://pressedwords.com/how-many-bloggers-use-each-version-of-wordpress/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://pressedwords.com/how-many-bloggers-use-each-version-of-wordpress/</link>
	<description>News and commentary about all things WordPress</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 13 May 2008 14:02:47 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: The Right Way to Use JavaScript in Your WordPress Plugin &#183; Pressed Words</title>
		<link>http://pressedwords.com/how-many-bloggers-use-each-version-of-wordpress/#comment-64</link>
		<dc:creator>The Right Way to Use JavaScript in Your WordPress Plugin &#183; Pressed Words</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Apr 2008 14:27:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pressedwords.com/how-many-bloggers-use-each-version-of-wordpress/#comment-64</guid>
		<description>[...] Both of those techniques have been available since WordPress 2.1, so plugin authors can be pretty confident that there will be no backwards-compatibility issues in employing them. (Despite the fact that WordPress is maintaining the 2.0.x version line until 2010, my research suggests that the number of users of that branch is insignificant.) [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Both of those techniques have been available since WordPress 2.1, so plugin authors can be pretty confident that there will be no backwards-compatibility issues in employing them. (Despite the fact that WordPress is maintaining the 2.0.x version line until 2010, my research suggests that the number of users of that branch is insignificant.) [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
