<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Crunchies: Did WordPress.org or Automattic Win?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://pressedwords.com/crunchies-did-wordpressorg-or-automattic-win/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://pressedwords.com/crunchies-did-wordpressorg-or-automattic-win/</link>
	<description>News and commentary about all things WordPress</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 03:34:39 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: New York Times Invests a Little Bit in Automattic Without Seeming to Know Why &#183; Pressed Words</title>
		<link>http://pressedwords.com/crunchies-did-wordpressorg-or-automattic-win/comment-page-1/#comment-26</link>
		<dc:creator>New York Times Invests a Little Bit in Automattic Without Seeming to Know Why &#183; Pressed Words</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Jan 2008 15:55:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pressedwords.com/crunchies-did-wordpressorg-or-automattic-win/#comment-26</guid>
		<description>[...] Pressed Words News and commentary about all things WordPress   Skip to content About     &#171; Crunchies: Did WordPress.org or Automattic Win? [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Pressed Words News and commentary about all things WordPress   Skip to content About     &laquo; Crunchies: Did WordPress.org or Automattic Win? [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
